Echo vs Husqvarna-is a never-ending debate going on among the chainsaw owners. Some people claim Husqvarna is better than the Echo whereas some people find Echo way better.
Echo chainsaw has better rpm speed yet comes with a less powerful engine. The fuel capacity is better in Echo compared to Husqvarna. You can start an Echo chainsaw even in cold weather and break it easily thanks to its dual post chain brake.
The Husqvarna offers an easy chain tensioning system, on the other hand, for easy operation. Maneuvering seems easy with the Husqvarna with its lightweight design compared to echo.
Then which one will be good for you? Well, let’s explore that.
Comparison Chart- Echo Vs Husqvarna Chainsaw
Echo vs Husqvarna comparison is incomplete without understanding their prime specifications. Let’s roll your eyes over the following chart.
|Distinction Topic||Echo Chainsaw||Husqvarna Chainsaw|
|Engine specifications||40.2 cc engine and 12,000 rpm speed.||40.9 cc engine with 9000 rpm maximum speed.|
|Fuel capacity||13.9 fluid ounces.||2.88 fluid ounces of fuel capacity.|
|Ease of use features||Dual-post chain-brake for easy braking and a cold-weather bypass system for easy starting in cold weather.||Chain-tensioning system to ensure ease of access and operation.|
|Safety advantage||Two-button system and kickback protection as well as handguards.||Instant stop safety button with a two-step chain starting mechanism.|
|Air filter specification||Tool-less removal systems with air pre-cleaner to prevent the entry of debris.||Centrifugal force is used to enable its air injection system.|
|Weight balance||Echo CS-400 model comes with 10.1 pounds weight.||The Husqvarna 435 model is lighter in weight. It weighs 9.33 pounds.|
|Chain bar size||Standard 18-inch chain bar. (Optional 16-inch chain bar)||Chain bars range from 13 to 18 inches.|
Head To Head Comparison– Echo Vs Husqvarna Chainsaw
From engine specification to operating maneuverability, everything is different when discussing two brands. Here are a few things to know about their distinctions.
Engine performance – Husqvarna wins here
While the comparison is between Echo vs Husqvarna chainsaw, you can’t avoid their engine performance. The Echo CS-400 model has a 40.2 CC engine whereas the Husqvarna 435 has a 40.9 CC engine. Almost every Husqvarna model uses the patented X-TORQ® technology to minimize exhaust emissions.
Also, Husqvarna chainsaw models require fewer refills than the Echo models. The Husqvarna Rancher contains a 60cc engine. On the flip side, the ECHO Timber Wolf comes with a 59.8cc engine. However, both chainsaws come with two-stroke engines for greater efficiency.
Fuel efficiency- Echo is the winner
Echo CS-400 chainsaw has a 13.9 fluid ounces fuel capacity. On the other hand, Husqvarna 435 has 2.88 fluid ounces fluid capacity. So, it’s easy to determine which chainsaw is more efficient in fuel capacity. If you think about environmental conservation and sustainability, Husqvarna wins here.
But, most people will surely focus on the fuel tank efficiency rather than thinking about the bad impacts. Echo’s chainsaw of this model is good for dedicated operations. Also, it reduces the hassle of refilling fuel again and again. Along with ensuring the consistency of work, it reduces user fatigue.
Safety features – Echo wins
Some pre-installed safety features of Echo and Husqvarna chainsaw have beaten various chainsaw models. Their chain brake system is especially mentionable here. Both chainsaws have great braking responses to avoid any unwanted situations.
The dual post chain brake system of Echo chainsaws is incredible. Surprisingly, their chainsaw braking system can show their performance faster than your imagination. However, Husqvarna’s braking system isn’t muchly appreciable in comparison to the Echo.
Anti-vibration feature – Husqvarna beats Echo
As an extension of the safety feature, the anti-vibration feature is added to both of the chainsaws. Due to this feature, the user remains safe from any vibration-oriented diseases. Husqvarna’s chainsaw generates 3.8 meters per second squared vibration.
Unfortunately, Echo doesn’t publish the exact vibration rating. The user experience votes for the Echo chainsaw because they vibrate in fewer ratings than the Husqvarna chainsaw. This anti-vibration technology is underrated in many other reviews. But, their contribution to ensuring user comfort as well as safety knows no bounds.
Durability and air filter – Echo wins
The first feature of a durable chainsaw is its built-in mechanisms. Unless the chainsaw has huge automated functions, it will barely run in the long run. The automatic oiling system and air cleaning system should be considered first. Though Echo and Husqvarna have the same oiling system, Echo has a less-efficient air filter.
The difference is in tool-less removal technology. Thinking about ease of use, Echo has brought an innovative tool-less air filter system. Husqvarna isn’t lagging behind as they have incredible centrifugal force-based air filter technology. If you consider only ease of use, Echo’s air filter wins here. Otherwise, the vote goes for Husqvarna.
Why should you pick Echo?
If you compare Echo CS-590 vs Husqvarna 460, Echo’s fuel tank definitely wins. The Echo CS-590 arrives with a 0.17-gallon tank. And, the Husqvarna has a 0.06 gallon smaller fuel tank.
Performance varies from model to model, you can’t deny that. If you compare Echo cs 400 vs Husqvarna 435, Echo wins with 12,000 rpm engine speed. The Echo CS-590 has 13,000 RPM maximum speed where the Husqvarna 460 has 9000 RPM. So, you know who to call the “winner” here.
Both Echo and Husqvarna models range between almost similar price ranges. The Echo CS-590 offers a 5-years limited warranty. Almost the same price range model “Husqvarna 460” offers only a 2-year warranty.
What are the drawbacks?
Lack of varieties
Like Husqvarna, Echo doesn’t come with a wide range of models. Different limb cutting, individual cutting styles, and other versatile works can’t easily be done with the Echo chainsaw.
Why should you pick Husqvarna?
Husqvarna is slightly lighter in comparison to the Echo. Though a lot of people will ignore this negligible difference, it’s a big factor for long-time use. The Husqvarna 435 has 0.77 pounds less weight than the Echo CS-590. That’s why you should pick it for any dedicated use.
You can understand Husqvarna’s brand reputation by comparing Stihl vs Husqvarna chainsaw. Husqvarna, a Swedish brand, is reputed for manufacturing chainsaws since 1689. Stihl, a German manufacturer, started its journey in 1926, which means two centuries later.
The Husqvarna 460 has an engine power of 3.62 HP. It’s slightly larger than a Stihl chainsaw. This slight variation in power shows a big output difference. You can perform the most difficult cutting activities easily with the Husqvarna 460 chainsaw.
What are the drawbacks
Husqvarna chainsaws don’t come with low-end torque. That means you may not get your desired cutting speed as well as efficiency. For this reason, you can’t easily use this chainsaw between knots and tree joints.
Which chainsaw works best in which condition?
Not both the saws are suitable for all types of chainsaw works. Let’s check out which chainsaw is suitable for which tasks.
Echo comes in a larger size that is suitable for larger projects such as logging and trimming. That is the reason people use this chainsaw for working in forests to cut larger trees. You can also use it for home use. But cleaning, re-oiling, and getting back to work is a little bit difficult with Echo chainsaw.
Husqvarna will be a good pick for both the small and larger projects since it comes in different sizing. Remember that you cannot use a large Husqvarna for a medium project that you can with Echo chainsaw. Oiling and cleaning are easier as well thanks to its quick-release air filters and auto oiling.
Which one offers larger chainsaw ranges?
Husqvaena comes with a lot of variation in sizes and fitting. From limb cutting to tree removing, you can get all types of jobs done with different Husqvaena chainsaws. Due to their different fittings, you can adjust the cutting length for even more versatility.
Echo, on the contrary, offers complete and total chainsaw instead of so many variations. You can use the same chainsaw to meet your different working and cutting needs. That is why people often pick Echo for a complete package without buying different saws for different tasks.
Where are the chainsaws made?
Chainsaw manufacturing plays a vital role for the quality. Let’s check where these chainsaws are made.
Until 2007, Echo was manufactured in the USA only. Then the company merging happened and from then on, Echo is being manufactured in the United States, Japan, and China. Both these countries are good for making electronic tools.
Husqvarna is manufactured in Sweden, United states, and germany. But most of their chainsaws are made in Sweden. You can be assured that they are not any kind of cheap china products.
Where are the chainsaws sold?
Echo has been sold mainly in the USA, China, Japan, Australia, and the UK. The rest of the sale depends on the importer and importer countries. On the other hand, Husqvarna is sold in Europe, USA, and some other parts of the world.
How much can replace the parts of the chainsaws?
You will often need to replace the parts of the chainsaw. Let’s see how available the parts are.
Echo does not sell all the replaceable parts in all the countries. However, if you live in the USA, you can find almost all the parts to replace including chain, guide bar, throttle, filters, and battery. On the other hand, for other countries, you may not find all the parts and need to rely on third parties to import those parts.
Husqvaena, on the other hand, offers parts replacement in every country where they sell their chainsaws. The best part is that they have their dealers to replace the parts so you can send the chainsaw to replace the parts.
Which one offers more warranty?
Echo offers 5 years of warranty in less money compared to Husqvaena. So when it comes to servicing and performance, Echo will be way ahead than Husqvaena.
Conclusion – So which one to buy?
The comparison will go on, but you need to determine which one will be a better pick for your project. When the lightweight design is the ultimate key factor for you, go for the Husqvarna. On the contrary, for good performance and higher efficiency, Echo wins at any time.
Consider your project type, wood type, and most importantly, working area. Then you can easily determine which one will be perfect for you.
But if you ask me, I will go with the Echo one any time. The reason is obvious. I will get better performance, higher efficiency, and quality service from it. I will sacrifice the weight to get all those benefits. Now the decision is yours.